Inside San Francisco Real Estate

Trends, tips & insights on San Francisco Real Estate

Archive for the ‘Homeowner Tips’ Category

Earthquake Insurance: To Have or Not To Have?

Posted by insidesfre on March 18, 2010

I’m often asked about earthquake insurance—do most homeowners in San Francisco have it? Do the majority of condo buildings have an earthquake policy?

Only about 12-15% of California homeowners have earthquake insurance, and I believe that ratio drops further in The Bay Area and San Francisco. The reason behind this is that earthquake insurance is very expensive. In a condo building, it doubles your homeowners association dues (HOAs). Additionally, most policies come with a 10-15% deductible. This means the damage to the building would have to be pretty severe in order for you to use your coverage.

What do you look for when evaluating how well a property will hold up against an earthquake? Take note of its overall construction material (i.e., wood-framed buildings tend to hold up better against ground shaking). Review the hazard report rating (i.e., is the building located in a Zone A–the most susceptible to an earthquake, or a Zone D/E, which would have a better chance in an earthquake). And consult a general contractor about how seismically sound the property may be (i.e., foundation bolted, etc). If a property was built before 1906 (year of the big earthquake) and it’s still standing, that’s a good indication that it’s been constructed well.

I have sold many condos in San Francisco over the past seven years, and maybe one or two condo buildings I’ve sold actually had earthquake insurance. Ironically, the buildings with earthquake insurance tend to be harder sells, because the HOA dues are prohibitively expensive for buyers. If you’re buying within a building that doesn’t have earthquake insurance, the HOA would have to decide whether to obtain that coverage. It’s not available on individual units.

If you’re interested in more information, contact your favorite insurance rep and inquire about the specifics for earthquake coverage.

Posted in Home Buyer Tips, Homeowner Tips | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

SF Moves to Prohibit Garage Installations

Posted by insidesfre on February 20, 2010

Our friends at Plan C are asking for support in the San Francisco garage arena. This is an important issue for homeowners and property values. I’m sending along Plan C’s recent alert that I received this weekend:

“Don’t let garages become prohibited in S.F.!

Supervisor David Chiu has proposed to essentially prohibit garages in his district; North Beach, Chinatown and Telegraph Hill. A property owner would have to obtain a conditional use permit to install a garage.

The Board of Supervisors would now be the body to hear appeals, not the Planning Commission and the Board of Appeals. The proposal would completely prohibit garages in buildings in which any “no fault” eviction – Owner Move In (OMI), Capital Improvement, Ellis Act evictions etc – was performed in the prior 10 years.

If passed, this proposal could be the first step towards imposing similar restrictions in other parts of the City.

This is a power grab by the Board of Supervisors and an attempt to incorporate the rent ordinance into the planning code and punish property owners. Both of these are bad ideas. Supervisor Dufty is the swing vote on this proposal. He voted for it with reservations on the first vote. We need you to write to him to let him know your opposition to this bad legislation. We need Supervisor Dufty to vote no on this, so that a Mayor’s veto can be sustained.

The next vote is scheduled for Tuesday February 23.

Please e-mail the Mayor, the Supervisors (including Supervisor Dufty) by clicking here – let them know that you oppose this legislation .

Also, please call the Mayor and Supervisor Dufty. Tell them the same thing (the phone call is easy, and youll be speaking either to a volunteer staffer or an aide):

Mayor Gavin Newsom 554-6141
District 1- Eric Mar- 554-7410
District 2- Michela Alioto-Pier- 554-7752
District 3- David Chiu- 554-7450
District 4- Carmen Chu- 554-7460
District 5- Ross Mirkarimi- 554-7630
District 6- Chris Daly- 554-7970
District 7- Sean Elsbernd- 554-6516
District 8- Bevan Dufty- 554-6968
District 9- David Campos- 554-5144
District 10- Sophie Maxwell- 554-7670
District 11- John Avalos- 554-6975″

Posted in Homeowner Tips | Tagged: | 4 Comments »

2010: Year of the Short Sale

Posted by insidesfre on February 18, 2010

It’s becoming more and more obvious as I tour, show and evaluate properties that there are many homeowners coming up on three-, five- or seven-year adjustable rate mortgage revisions. And in many cases, they won’t be able to refinance or keep their property at the higher interest rate. Those are definitely ingredients for a rise in short sales over the next year.

But fortunately, some of the major lenders are warming up to short sales, according to a story yesterday in the Financial Times. Bank of America, in particular, has added staff to handle short sales. And Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, and other large banks seem to be following suit.

So if you’re evaluating a property that will be a known short sale, have your agent find out which lenders are involved. If it’s one of the big boys, it might mean a shorter waiting time for short sale approval. No buyers want to sit around for three months waiting for their offer to be approved by the bank; if the wait time is no longer in question, short sales may be easier to navigate. And if you’re a potential seller with one of these large banks holding your loan, now may be the time to work something out.

Posted in Home Buyer Tips, Homeowner Tips | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Best Strategy for Home Sellers: Disclose, Disclose, Disclose

Posted by insidesfre on January 26, 2010

The Wall Street Journal ran an excellent article last week on “What Home Sellers Don’t Tell Buyers. The upshot is that sellers are, in some cases, omitting certain key disclosures because they don’t want to jeopardize their property sales in a challenging housing market.

The article coincides with my license renewal studies, which cover similar ground. But you know, I don’t approach listing disclosures assuming that sellers are hiding pertinent details about their homes. The sellers with whom I’ve worked have generally tended to go out of their way to disclose even the most minor deficiencies. Not to pat myself on the back, but I typically sit down with sellers while they complete the extensive disclosure package, going over each form line by line and clarifying the questions. It’s this approach that I believe leads to more thorough disclosures for buyers. It also gives me the opportunity to learn all the property details before the marketing begins, which results in clear, accurate fact presentation to agents and prospective buyers.

As the Wall Street Journal article points out, California requires an extremely long list of seller disclosures; we are not a “buyer beware” state. (However, this isn’t the case for foreclosure properties, which are, in my opinion, “buyer beware” scenarios.)

Sellers, hook up with a reputable broker, provide the required San Francisco building/hazard reports, and take the time to thoughtfully complete your disclosure package—preferably with your agent sitting next to you. The couple of hours you take to fill out paperwork will certainly not exceed the time it will take to sit in mediation, arbitration or in attorneys’ offices down the line.

Posted in Homeowner Tips | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

The Ins and Outs of Unwarranted Rooms, Repairs & Remodels

Posted by insidesfre on January 12, 2010

In real estate circles, San Francisco is famous for the prevalence of “unwarranted,” or “illegal” rooms. Homeowners also sometimes tire of the city permit process, and elect to do kitchen/bathroom remodels or construct decks without pulling permits.

How does work without permits affect a home? Ultimately, the property’s safety may be compromised.

For major renovations—say, adding a unit or bedroom and bath—a homeowner will apply for a permit from the city. Besides serving as a revenue stream for the city, a permit warrants that the appropriate city inspectors have reviewed and approved electrical wiring, plumbing, etc., and that everything is up to code.

When your job is completed and approved by the city, the signoff ultimately goes on your property’s 3R, or building permit history, report. This is one of the key reports provided to future buyers in a sale. Completed permits give buyers peace of mind that any renovations or repairs that typically require permits were done according to building code.

Some work done without permit is safe and will never present any issues. However, if a homeowner decides to, for example, upgrade a foundation, a city inspector may spot the unwarranted room within the property. At that point, he or she can ask to see plans and permits for that room, ultimately requesting that you legalize it.

And if you decide to buy a house with an unwarranted unit and rent out that unit, you may run into problems if a neighbor decides to notify the city. In that case, inspectors would visit your property and potentially request that you dismantle the illegal unit. (Or legalize the property by creating two units, which may not be structurally possible.)

When evaluating properties, it’s important to check building permit histories to ensure that they match up to the details of the home. For example, if a kitchen was obviously remodeled sometime after the construction date of the property and there are no permits on file, it’d be a good idea to have your inspector flag any potential code items he or she sees. Of course, you can’t tear open walls, but some things are apparent code violators to a trained eye.

It’s challenging to put dollar amounts on unwarranted work. Instead, make sure you use the right comparative sales in your evaluation. For example, a “room down” or “bonus room” in a two-bedroom single-family home isn’t technically an official bedroom. (The dollar amount may be the difference between two- and three-bedroom homes values.) In this case, the best comps would be those with similar layouts (not three bedrooms).

In all cases, I don’t recommend omitting inspections—especially when unwarranted work is disclosed or suspected.

Posted in Home Buyer Tips, Homeowner Tips | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »

The Planning Dept Wants Your Two Cents

Posted by insidesfre on December 11, 2009

Hate that new monster home across the street from you that never should’ve gotten the thumbs up? Now’s your chance to speak up.

The Planning Department acknowledges a perceived public lack of trust in its discretionary review (DR) process that ultimately approves, rejects and modifies proposed building projects. As part of its improvement efforts, the Department is currently seeking addresses of projects that have been approved and/or built which did not resonate well with the public. The Department wants to analyze these projects in the context of DR reform.

This is your chance to speak up! If you’re aware of a project wherein you believe the DR process failed, please send the site address (and, if possible, the permit number or DR case number) to Elizabeth Watty (elizabeth.watty@sfgov.org/415.558.6620) by January 24, 2010. The Department’s goal is to analyze these projects in time for the next hearing on the subject that will take place on Febuary 22nd.

Posted in Homeowner Tips, SF Tidbits | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

SF 311: Catch-All for Your Problems

Posted by insidesfre on November 9, 2009

I recently used the newish SF 311 service that the city established to help residents resolve whatever issues are on their plates. The service cuts to the chase so you don’t have to spend time figuring out which department or agency will be able to help you.

I’ve contacted 311 twice in the past couple of weeks. First, I wanted to make a request for someone to pick up the stupid, full-size boxspring that someone left outside my house. I decided to contact 311 via Twitter. I sent a message to 311 on a Sunday, and got a response informing me that the city would respond to the request within three calendar days.

The boxspring was still sitting outside by 5PM on Wednesday. I sent a followup message via Twitter on Wednesday evening, and was informed that the Dept. of Public Works (DPW) had closed out the ticket and that the boxpring had been picked up. The Twitter rep offered to resubmit the request. But at this point, I didn’t feel like waiting another three days. So on Thursday morning, I called 311 and explained the situation. The boxspring was gone by the afternoon.

I also called 311 to find out the process for obtaining a parking permit for a moving truck. My client had closed escrow, and was going to need to block off parking spaces for the moving truck. 311 got me the contact information for the appropriate police precinct, and from there, I got the very complicated set of directions for the moving process.

Check out the various areas in which 311 can help. I’d recommend simply dialing 311 vs. submitting online requests. (When I tried to track my request for the boxspring pickup via my PC and iPhone, I got error messages. It’s probably best to just deal with a live customer service rep. In any event, keep 311 in mind for whatever random question or issue that might arise.

Posted in Home Buyer Tips, Homeowner Tips, SF Tidbits | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Best Trick or Treat ‘Hoods in SF

Posted by insidesfre on October 30, 2009

I came across Zillow’s Trick or Treat housing index yesterday, and found its picks for Best Trick or Treat Neighborhoods to be very amusing.

You can’t argue with the winners: Presidio Heights, Noe Valley, Richmond, Haight, and Sunset. But I’ll also nominate Cole Valley (have you ever seen Belvedere Street in action on Halloween?!) and Potrero Hill.

So readers, what neighborhoods do you nominate for the best Halloween spirit? Comments, please! And have a fun and safe Halloween, everyone!

Posted in Haight/NoPa, Home Buyer Tips, Homeowner Tips, Mission/Potrero, Noe/Eureka Valley, North End of Town, Richmond, SF Tidbits, Sunset/Parkside | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Sellers Add Water Work to Checklist

Posted by insidesfre on September 18, 2009

Anyone gearing up to sell their property needs to know about a new water conservation ordinance that went into effect over the summer.

Aimed at increasing water efficiency and overall conservation, the new law requires residential properties to be retrofitted upon resale. Here are the new requirements:
- all showerheads have maximum flow of 2.5 gpm (gallons per minute)
- showers have no more than one showerhead per valve
- faucets and faucet aerators have max flow rate of 2.2 gpm
- toilets have a max consumption of 1.6 gallons per flush
- all water leaks have been repaired.

A qualified energy and water inspector is the professional sellers will call in to survey their property and potentially make whichever changes are necessary. Sellers should also note that transferring compliance to the buyers is possible, but only if the title company holds back 1% of the purchase price in escrow. The buyers then have 180 days from the property sale to complete the work. Any unused portions of the holdback are returned to the seller after the certificate of completion is filed with the Department of Building Inspection.

There are toilet, faucet, and showerhead rebates available, so check the details prior to moving ahead with any work.

Posted in Homeowner Tips | Tagged: | 2 Comments »

Unrealistic Sellers Withdraw from the Market

Posted by insidesfre on September 16, 2009

27th When I first reported on 141 27th Street in Noe Valley earlier this year, work was underway on this major fixer located behind my home. It had been purchased in the pre-stock market crash haze of August 2008 for $950,000 (list price was $637,500) by a group that planned to renovate and flip.

The renovations were surprisingly limited to working within the envelope of the building, with no vertical or horizontal additions. I was a bit skeptical that a finished product would result in the $950,000 purchase price making sense.

Indeed, after 116 days on the market at $1,595,000, the sellers of this 3BR/3BA property decided to withdraw the property in mid August.

I think the summer was the time to separate the realistic from the unrealistic. Indeed, there were 209 single-family homes, 476 condos/TICs, and 80 two- to four-unit buildings withdrawn from June through mid September. That’s a lot of properties.

I’m betting we’ll see less withdrawn and more sold properties this Fall, if only because sellers will hopefully learn from others’ misfires.

Posted in Homeowner Tips, Noe/Eureka Valley | Tagged: , | 5 Comments »